Richard Payne v. Anna M. Siegrist

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 28, 2012·No. 04-11-00833-CV·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-11-00833-CV

Richard PAYNE, Appellant

v.

Anna M. SIEGRIST, et al., Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas Trial Court No. 11-02-00040-CVK Honorable Ron Carr, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 28, 2012

DISMISSED

Appellant’s brief, which was due on January 30, 2012, has not been filed. On February

15, 2012, this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing within fifteen days why this

appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant, proceeding pro se, filed a

written response. Appellant’s response, however, does not explain why he has failed to file an

appellant’s brief, does not request additional time to file an appellant’s brief, and cannot be 04-11-00833-CV

construed as an appellant’s brief. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Payne v. Anna M. Siegrist, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Richard Payne v. Anna M. Siegrist (Richard Payne v. Anna M. Siegrist) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.