Richard Payne v. Anna M. Siegrist
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-11-00833-CV
Richard PAYNE, Appellant
v.
Anna M. SIEGRIST, et al., Appellees
From the 218th Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas Trial Court No. 11-02-00040-CVK Honorable Ron Carr, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 28, 2012
DISMISSED
Appellant’s brief, which was due on January 30, 2012, has not been filed. On February
15, 2012, this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing within fifteen days why this
appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant, proceeding pro se, filed a
written response. Appellant’s response, however, does not explain why he has failed to file an
appellant’s brief, does not request additional time to file an appellant’s brief, and cannot be 04-11-00833-CV
construed as an appellant’s brief. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richard Payne v. Anna M. Siegrist (Richard Payne v. Anna M. Siegrist) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.