Richard Marzullo v. United States
This text of 37 F.3d 1502 (Richard Marzullo v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
37 F.3d 1502
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
Richard MARZULLO, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 94-2430.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 12, 1994.
Filed: Oct. 17, 1994.
Before MAGILL, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Richard Marzullo appeals from the district court's1 order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. Marzullo asserted Fourth Amendment, evidentiary and ineffective assistance of counsel claims. We have carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs and conclude that no error of law appears. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons set forth in its opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
The Honorable Elmo B. Hunter, Senior United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 F.3d 1502, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35929, 1994 WL 562000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-marzullo-v-united-states-ca8-1994.