Richard M. Wright and Lynea Wright v. International Harvester Company, a Delaware Corporation

Eighth Circuit

Richard M. Wright and Lynea Wright v. International Harvester Company, a Delaware Corporation

736 F.2d 483, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 21316

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJune 20, 1984

Docket83-2297

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 736 F.2d 483 (Richard M. Wright and Lynea Wright v. International Harvester Company, a Delaware Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richard M. Wright and Lynea Wright v. International Harvester Company, a Delaware Corporation, 736 F.2d 483, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 21316 (8th Cir. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Richard M. Wright brought this products liability action in United States District Court for the District of South Dakota against International Harvester. Wright sought to recover damages for injuries sustained while he was using an International Harvester (IH) McCormick Model 46 Hay Baler. The complaint was filed in district court on October 28, 1982. Federal jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship and amount in controversy.

On June 20, 1983, IH moved for summary judgment on the ground that the suit was barred by S.D. CODIFIED LAWS ANN. § 15-2-12.1 (1978), which imposes a six-year time limit on products liability actions. Wright opposed the motion, claiming that S.D. CODIFIED LAWS ANN. § 15-2-12.1 was unconstitutional. The district court granted summary judgment for IH on August 30, 1983. Wright appeals, seeking reversal of the summary judgment, or in the alternative, he asks this court to remand the case to the district court with instructions to certify the question to the South Dakota Supreme Court. Subsequent to the filing of the instant appeal, the South Dakota Supreme Court held S.D. CODIFIED LAWS ANN. § 15-2-12.1 (1978) unconstitutional. Daugaard v. Baltic Cooperative Building Supply Ass’n., 349 N.W.2d 419, at 427 (S.D.1984). Accordingly, we remand this action to the district court for further proceedings in light of the Daugaard case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Richard M. Wright brought this products liability action in United States District Court for the District of South Dakota against International Harvester. Wright sought to recover damages for injuries sustained while he was using an International Harvester (IH) McCormick Model 46 Hay Baler. The complaint was filed in district court on October 28, 1982. Federal jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship and amount in controversy.

On June 20, 1983, IH moved for summary judgment on the ground that the suit was barred by S.D. CODIFIED LAWS ANN. § 15-2-12.1 (1978), which imposes a six-year time limit on products liability actions. Wright opposed the motion, claiming that S.D. CODIFIED LAWS ANN. § 15-2-12.1 was unconstitutional. The district court granted summary judgment for IH on August 30, 1983. Wright appeals, seeking reversal of the summary judgment, or in the alternative, he asks this court to remand the case to the district court with instructions to certify the question to the South Dakota Supreme Court. Subsequent to the filing of the instant appeal, the South Dakota Supreme Court held S.D. CODIFIED LAWS ANN. § 15-2-12.1 (1978) unconstitutional. Daugaard v. Baltic Cooperative Building Supply Ass’n., 349 N.W.2d 419, at 427 (S.D.1984). Accordingly, we remand this action to the district court for further proceedings in light of the Daugaard case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

736 F.2d 483, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 21316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-m-wright-and-lynea-wright-v-international-harvester-company-a-ca8-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack