Richard M. v. Princess R.F.
90 A.D.3d 555, 934 N.Y.2d 702
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 20, 2011
StatusPublished
This text of 90 A.D.3d 555 (Richard M. v. Princess R.F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Richard M. v. Princess R.F., 90 A.D.3d 555, 934 N.Y.2d 702 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
Opinion
Family Court correctly found that respondent demonstrated neither a reasonable excuse for her failure to appear in court nor a meritorious defense to the petition (Matter of Amirah Nicole A. [Tamika R.], 73 AD3d 428 [2010], lv dismissed 15 NY3d 766 [2010]). Concur — Saxe, J.P, Catterson, Moskowitz and Acosta, Renwick JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Nicole A.
73 A.D.3d 428 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
90 A.D.3d 555, 934 N.Y.2d 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-m-v-princess-rf-nyappdiv-2011.