Richard Lowell Stratton v. O. I. White
This text of 825 F.2d 408 (Richard Lowell Stratton v. O. I. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
825 F.2d 408
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Richard Lowell STRATTON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
O. I. WHITE, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 87-7117
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 30, 1987.
Decided July 31, 1987.
Richard Lowell Stratton, appellant pro se.
Michael A. Humphreys, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.
Before WIDENER and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Stratton v. White, C/A No. 86-262-AM (E.D. Va., Mar. 31, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
825 F.2d 408, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 10123, 1987 WL 38318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-lowell-stratton-v-o-i-white-ca4-1987.