Richard Lloyd v. C.E. Thompson, Warden Mary Sue Terry, Attorney General for the State of Virginia

Fourth Circuit

Richard Lloyd v. C.E. Thompson, Warden Mary Sue Terry, Attorney General for the State of Virginia

54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17380, 1995 WL 310149

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 22, 1995

Docket94-7333

StatusPublished

This text of 54 F.3d 773 (Richard Lloyd v. C.E. Thompson, Warden Mary Sue Terry, Attorney General for the State of Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richard Lloyd v. C.E. Thompson, Warden Mary Sue Terry, Attorney General for the State of Virginia, 54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17380, 1995 WL 310149 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

54 F.3d 773
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Richard LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
C.E. THOMPSON, Warden; Mary Sue Terry, Attorney General for
the State of Virginia, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7333.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 22, 1995.

Richard Lloyd, appellant pro se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lloyd v. Thompson, No. CA-94-1063 (E.D. Va. Nov. 1, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

54 F.3d 773
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Richard LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
C.E. THOMPSON, Warden; Mary Sue Terry, Attorney General for
the State of Virginia, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7333.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 22, 1995.

Richard Lloyd, appellant pro se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lloyd v. Thompson, No. CA-94-1063 (E.D. Va. Nov. 1, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17380, 1995 WL 310149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-lloyd-v-ce-thompson-warden-mary-sue-terry--ca4-1995.