Richard Lloyd Dilley v. Janet Barbour, Superintendent

Ninth Circuit

Richard Lloyd Dilley v. Janet Barbour, Superintendent

60 F.3d 833, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25470, 1995 WL 392119

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 3, 1995

Docket94-35843

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 833 (Richard Lloyd Dilley v. Janet Barbour, Superintendent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richard Lloyd Dilley v. Janet Barbour, Superintendent, 60 F.3d 833, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25470, 1995 WL 392119 (9th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

60 F.3d 833
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Richard Lloyd DILLEY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Janet BARBOUR, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 94-35843.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 26, 1995.*
Decided July 3, 1995.

Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Richard Lloyd Dilley, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Dilley is serving the sentence of 84 months that was imposed after he pleaded guilty to five counts of child molestation and one count of raping a child. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253, and we affirm for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Second Report and Recommendation, which fully and fairly addressed all the issues Dilley raises in this appeal.

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

60 F.3d 833
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Richard Lloyd DILLEY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Janet BARBOUR, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 94-35843.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 26, 1995.*
Decided July 3, 1995.

Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Richard Lloyd Dilley, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Dilley is serving the sentence of 84 months that was imposed after he pleaded guilty to five counts of child molestation and one count of raping a child. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253, and we affirm for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Second Report and Recommendation, which fully and fairly addressed all the issues Dilley raises in this appeal.

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F.3d 833, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25470, 1995 WL 392119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-lloyd-dilley-v-janet-barbour-superintenden-ca9-1995.