Richard Litschewski v. Robert Dooley

502 F. App'x 630
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 23, 2013
Docket12-3338
StatusUnpublished

This text of 502 F. App'x 630 (Richard Litschewski v. Robert Dooley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richard Litschewski v. Robert Dooley, 502 F. App'x 630 (8th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Inmate Richard Litschewski appeals the district court’s 1 adverse judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. 2 Upon de novo review, see Bahl v. County of Ramsey, 695 F.3d 778, 783 (8th Cir.2012) (summary judgment); King v. Iowa Dep’t of Corr., 598 F.3d 1051, 1052 (8th Cir.2010) (Prison Litigation Reform Act’s administrative-exhaustion provision), we conclude that affir-mance is warranted on the merits, see Wood v. SatCom Mktg., LLC, 705 F.3d 823, 827 (8th Cir.2013) (summary judgment may be affirmed on any basis supported by record). The judgment of the district court is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny Litschewski’s motion to supplement his brief.

1

. The Honorable Roberto A. Lange, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.

2

. We have not considered matters Litschewski has waived on appeal. See Coates v. Powell, 639 F.3d 471, 475 n. 5 (8th Cir.2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. Iowa Department of Corrections
598 F.3d 1051 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)
Coates v. Powell
639 F.3d 471 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
Douglas Duane Bahl v. City of St. Paul
695 F.3d 778 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)
Jenna Wood v. SatCom Marketing, LLC
705 F.3d 823 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
502 F. App'x 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-litschewski-v-robert-dooley-ca8-2013.