Richard Leslie Thomas, Jr. v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 27, 2004
Docket02-04-00114-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Richard Leslie Thomas, Jr. v. State (Richard Leslie Thomas, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richard Leslie Thomas, Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Thomas v. State

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-04-114-CR

RICHARD LESLIE THOMAS, JR. APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 367 TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1)

Richard Leslie Thomas, Jr., who is serving a life sentence for murder, is attempting to appeal the trial court’s order denying his motion for DNA testing.  We will dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

The order denying the motion for DNA testing was entered on December 11, 2003; therefore, appellant’s notice of appeal was due by January 12, 2004.   See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).  The notice of appeal was not filed, however, until March 2, 2004.  On March 22, 2004, we notified appellant by letter of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over the appeal and that the appeal was subject to dismissal unless he or any other party filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  In response, appellant states that he had no notice of the trial court’s order until February 18, 2004.

A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is essential to vest this court with jurisdiction over the appeal.   Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).  Where, as here, the notice of appeal is untimely, our authority is limited to dismissing the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.   Id. ; Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). (footnote: 2)  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

PANEL D: CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: May 27, 2004

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2:

The appropriate vehicle for seeking an out-of-time appeal is by application for writ of habeas corpus to the court of criminal appeals.   Portley v. State, 89 S.W.3d 188, 189 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2002, no pet.); Reyes v. State, 883 S.W.2d 291, 293 n.2 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1994, no pet.); see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 1 (Vernon Supp. 2004) (stating that article 11.07 establishes procedures for seeking habeas relief from felony judgment imposing penalty other than death).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Portley v. State
89 S.W.3d 188 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)
Reyes v. State
883 S.W.2d 291 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)
Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Richard Leslie Thomas, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-leslie-thomas-jr-v-state-texapp-2004.