Richard Lee Quinonez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 6, 2008
Docket13-07-00653-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Richard Lee Quinonez v. State (Richard Lee Quinonez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richard Lee Quinonez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-07-653-CR



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________________



RICHARD LEE QUINONEZ, Appellant,



v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

_______________________________________________________



On appeal from the 117th District Court
of Nueces County, Texas.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, Richard Lee Quinonez, attempts to appeal a conviction for robbery. The trial court has certified that "the defendant has waived the right of appeal." See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On October 18, 2007, this Court notified appellant's counsel of the trial court's certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel's findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

On January 16, 2008, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel's response does not establish: (1) that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect, or (2) that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court's certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.



PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 6th day of March, 2008.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Richard Lee Quinonez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-lee-quinonez-v-state-texapp-2008.