Richard Lee Pollard v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 10, 2015·No. 03-14-00545-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00545-CR

Richard Lee Pollard, Appellant v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY NO. CR6692, THE HONORABLE DANIEL H. MILLS, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER FOR CLERK TO PROVIDE A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D TO A P P E L L A N T

PER CURIAM Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on or before June 15, 2015. See id. at 321.

It is ordered on June 5, 2015.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Bourland Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Lee Pollard v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Richard Lee Pollard v. State (Richard Lee Pollard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)