Richard Lee Ingle v. Cletus J. Fitzharris
This text of 411 F.2d 611 (Richard Lee Ingle v. Cletus J. Fitzharris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a writ of habeas corpus after an evidentiary hearing held pursuant to our mandate in Ingle v. Fitzharris, 375 F.2d 398 (9th Cir., 1967). The factual issues identified in our opinion were fully explored at the hearing. The district court found that the evidence failed to sustain appellant’s allegations. Appellant merely reasserts the allegations rejected below. The record discloses no reason to disturb the district court’s findings.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
411 F.2d 611, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-lee-ingle-v-cletus-j-fitzharris-ca9-1969.