Richard Lee Ingle v. Cletus J. Fitzharris

Ninth Circuit

Richard Lee Ingle v. Cletus J. Fitzharris

411 F.2d 611, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12501

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 7, 1969·No. 23057·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a writ of habeas corpus after an evidentiary hearing held pursuant to our mandate in Ingle v. Fitzharris, 375 F.2d 398 (9th Cir., 1967). The factual issues identified in our opinion were fully explored at the hearing. The district court found that the evidence failed to sustain appellant’s allegations. Appellant merely reasserts the allegations rejected below. The record discloses no reason to disturb the district court’s findings.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a writ of habeas corpus after an evidentiary hearing held pursuant to our mandate in Ingle v. Fitzharris, 375 F.2d 398 (9th Cir., 1967). The factual issues identified in our opinion were fully explored at the hearing. The district court found that the evidence failed to sustain appellant’s allegations. Appellant merely reasserts the allegations rejected below. The record discloses no reason to disturb the district court’s findings.

Affirmed.

Richard Lee Ingle v. Cletus J. Fitzharris, 411 F.2d 611, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12501 (9th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

411 F.2d 611 (Richard Lee Ingle v. Cletus J. Fitzharris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related