Richard Lee Crews v. George Deeds Doctor Quinones

Fourth Circuit

Richard Lee Crews v. George Deeds Doctor Quinones

56 F.3d 60, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19081, 1995 WL 318443

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 25, 1995

Docket95-6219

StatusPublished

This text of 56 F.3d 60 (Richard Lee Crews v. George Deeds Doctor Quinones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richard Lee Crews v. George Deeds Doctor Quinones, 56 F.3d 60, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19081, 1995 WL 318443 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

56 F.3d 60
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Richard Lee CREWS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
George DEEDS; Doctor Quinones, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6219.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995
Decided: May 25, 1995.

Richard Lee Crews, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Theresa Bowers, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Crews v. Deeds, No. CA-94-1006 (W.D.Va. Jan. 10, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion to be quarantined. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

56 F.3d 60
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Richard Lee CREWS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
George DEEDS; Doctor Quinones, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6219.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995
Decided: May 25, 1995.

Richard Lee Crews, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Theresa Bowers, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Crews v. Deeds, No. CA-94-1006 (W.D.Va. Jan. 10, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion to be quarantined. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 F.3d 60, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19081, 1995 WL 318443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-lee-crews-v-george-deeds-doctor-quinones-ca4-1995.