Richard Ledbetter v. . J. I. Osborne

66 N.C. 379
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 66 N.C. 379 (Richard Ledbetter v. . J. I. Osborne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richard Ledbetter v. . J. I. Osborne, 66 N.C. 379 (N.C. 1872).

Opinion

DiCK, J.

A judgment in a Justice’s Court does not create a lien upon the property of the defendant. To have this effect a transcript of the judgment must be filed, and docketed in the office of the Superior-Court clerk of the county, where the judgment rendered. C. C. P., see. 503.

This proceeding places the judgment on the judgment docket of the Superior Court to create a lien and for the purposes of execution, and in this respect only is it a judgment of the Superior Court. The record of proceedings and the original papers in the cause remain in the Court of the Justice, and the case can only be regularly carried to the trial docket of the Superior Court by appeal.

This application is in the nature of a motion in the cause to set aside the judgment and grant a new trial upon the merits. The motion was properly refused by Hfs Honor, as the case was corone non judice. If the plaintiff has merits, and has not been guilty of unreasonable laches, lie may upon a proper application obtain a writ of recordari as a substitute for an appeal. The writ of recordari is the proper remedy, and not a certiorari. A Justice’s Court is an inferior court of limited jurisdiction, not proceeding according to the course of common law, and although a justice is required to keep a docket and enter his proceedings, this does not constitute his court a court of record. When an appeal is taken from his judgment, he •does not send up a duly certified transcript of record as the ¡foundation of the action of the appellate Court, but he is also required to file the original papers in the cause. C. C. P., sec. 587, 540.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oldham v. . Rieger
62 S.E. 612 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1908)
Whitehurst v. Merchants & Farmers Transportation Co.
13 S.E. 937 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)
Morton v. . Rippy
84 N.C. 611 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1881)
Broyles Ex Rel. Gibbs v. Young
81 N.C. 315 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1879)
Cannon v. . Parker
81 N.C. 320 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1879)
Reeves v. . Davis
80 N.C. 209 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1879)
Birdsey v. . Harris
68 N.C. 92 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1873)
Hutchison v. . Symons
67 N.C. 156 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 N.C. 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-ledbetter-v-j-i-osborne-nc-1872.