Richard Lamar Patterson v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Richard Lamar Patterson v. United States

368 F.2d 331

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 4, 1966

Docket23180_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 368 F.2d 331 (Richard Lamar Patterson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richard Lamar Patterson v. United States, 368 F.2d 331 (5th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a judgment entered after a jury verdict of guilty on a four count indictment charging appellant with having violated the internal revenue laws relating to illicit distilled spirits. 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 5179(a); 5205(a) (2); 5601(a) (1), (4); 5604(a) (1); and 5686.

The record demonstrates a sufficiency of evidence to warrant the conviction; no illegal search; and no error in admitting a prior felony conviction, after appellant testified, for purposes of impeachment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a judgment entered after a jury verdict of guilty on a four count indictment charging appellant with having violated the internal revenue laws relating to illicit distilled spirits. 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 5179(a); 5205(a) (2); 5601(a) (1), (4); 5604(a) (1); and 5686.

The record demonstrates a sufficiency of evidence to warrant the conviction; no illegal search; and no error in admitting a prior felony conviction, after appellant testified, for purposes of impeachment.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

368 F.2d 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-lamar-patterson-v-united-states-ca5-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack