Richard L. Dugger v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
This text of 403 F.2d 719 (Richard L. Dugger v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, Richard L. Dugger, brought an action against his employer, Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, claiming vacation pay under Section 9 of the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 50 U.S.C.A. Sec. 459. The district court concluded that any right to vacation pay must depend upon the terms of the labor agreement between the railroad and its employees. Under this agreement, the district court decided, no vacation pay should be awarded. Dugger v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, D. C.S.D.Tex.1967, 276 F.Supp. 496. From the district court judgment Dugger has appealed. The decision of the district court is sound and its judgment should be and is
Affirmed.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
403 F.2d 719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-l-dugger-v-missouri-pacific-railroad-company-ca5-1969.