Richard Kelly and Denise Kelly v. Jimmy Don Krauser

Court of Appeals of Texas

Richard Kelly and Denise Kelly v. Jimmy Don Krauser

DecidedAugust 4, 2005

Docket13-05-00330-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Richard Kelly and Denise Kelly v. Jimmy Don Krauser (Richard Kelly and Denise Kelly v. Jimmy Don Krauser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richard Kelly and Denise Kelly v. Jimmy Don Krauser, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-05-330-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

RICHARD KELLY AND DENISE KELLY, Appellants,

v.

JIMMY DON KRAUSER, Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 135th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, RICHARD KELLY AND DENISE KELLY, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 135th District Court of Victoria County, Texas, in cause number 03-6-59,876-B. After the notice of appeal was filed and after the appeal was abated pending settlement, the parties filed a joint motion to reinstate the appeal and reverse and render a take-nothing judgment effectuating the parties= settlement agreement. In the motion, the parties state that the settlement in this matter has been finalized. The parties request that the appeal be reinstated and that the judgment of the trial court be reversed and judgment rendered that appellee take nothing on all of his claims against appellants. The parties further request that all costs be taxed against the party incurring them.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the parties= joint motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The joint motion is granted. The appeal is reinstated, the judgment of the trial court is hereby REVERSED, and judgment is RENDERED that appellee take nothing on his claims against appellants. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against the party incurring same.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 4th day of August, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-05-330-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

RICHARD KELLY AND DENISE KELLY, Appellants,

v.

JIMMY DON KRAUSER, Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 135th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, RICHARD KELLY AND DENISE KELLY, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 135th District Court of Victoria County, Texas, in cause number 03-6-59,876-B. After the notice of appeal was filed and after the appeal was abated pending settlement, the parties filed a joint motion to reinstate the appeal and reverse and render a take-nothing judgment effectuating the parties= settlement agreement. In the motion, the parties state that the settlement in this matter has been finalized. The parties request that the appeal be reinstated and that the judgment of the trial court be reversed and judgment rendered that appellee take nothing on all of his claims against appellants. The parties further request that all costs be taxed against the party incurring them.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the parties= joint motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The joint motion is granted. The appeal is reinstated, the judgment of the trial court is hereby REVERSED, and judgment is RENDERED that appellee take nothing on his claims against appellants. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against the party incurring same.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 4th day of August, 2005.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Richard Kelly and Denise Kelly v. Jimmy Don Krauser, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-kelly-and-denise-kelly-v-jimmy-don-krauser-texapp-2005.