Richard Johnson v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Richard Johnson v. United States

354 F.2d 240, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7632

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 5, 1966·No. 19711·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On consideration of the appeal, we find a strictly factual issue was deter *241 mined in the District Court adverse to appellant. Under well-known rules governing our examination of evidence on an appeal, the evidence supports the trial court’s determination, and we affirm.

The above affirmance renders appellant’s request for bail moot, and therefore the request for bail is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

On consideration of the appeal, we find a strictly factual issue was deter *241 mined in the District Court adverse to appellant. Under well-known rules governing our examination of evidence on an appeal, the evidence supports the trial court’s determination, and we affirm.

The above affirmance renders appellant’s request for bail moot, and therefore the request for bail is dismissed.

Richard Johnson v. United States, 354 F.2d 240, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7632 (9th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

354 F.2d 240 (Richard Johnson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.