Richard Jimenez v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

468 F.2d 616
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 18, 1972·No. 72-1827·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant Richard Jimenez, a state prisoner, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that prison officials subjected him to mistreatment and cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. The complaint was dismissed by the district court without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of the district court is vacated and the case is remanded for an evidentiary hearing. Jimenez v. Beto, 405 U.S. 910, 92 S.Ct. 989, 30 L.Ed.2d 781 (1972); Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972).

Vacated and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Jimenez v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 468 F.2d 616 (5th Cir. 1972).

468 F.2d 616 (Richard Jimenez v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related