Richard Jimenez v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

Fifth Circuit

Richard Jimenez v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

468 F.2d 616

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedOctober 18, 1972

Docket72-1827

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 468 F.2d 616 (Richard Jimenez v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richard Jimenez v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 468 F.2d 616 (5th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant Richard Jimenez, a state prisoner, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that prison officials subjected him to mistreatment and cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. The complaint was dismissed by the district court without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of the district court is vacated and the case is remanded for an evidentiary hearing. Jimenez v. Beto, 405 U.S. 910, 92 S.Ct. 989, 30 L.Ed.2d 781 (1972); Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972).

Vacated and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The appellant Richard Jimenez, a state prisoner, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that prison officials subjected him to mistreatment and cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. The complaint was dismissed by the district court without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of the district court is vacated and the case is remanded for an evidentiary hearing. Jimenez v. Beto, 405 U.S. 910, 92 S.Ct. 989, 30 L.Ed.2d 781 (1972); Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972).

Vacated and remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

468 F.2d 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-jimenez-v-dr-george-j-beto-director-texas-department-of-ca5-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack