Richard Jensen, Applicant v. H. O. Teets, Warden, California State Prison, San Quentin, California

219 F.2d 235
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 9, 1955
Docket416
StatusPublished

This text of 219 F.2d 235 (Richard Jensen, Applicant v. H. O. Teets, Warden, California State Prison, San Quentin, California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richard Jensen, Applicant v. H. O. Teets, Warden, California State Prison, San Quentin, California, 219 F.2d 235 (9th Cir. 1955).

Opinion

219 F.2d 235

Richard JENSEN, Applicant,
v.
H. O. TEETS, Warden, California State Prison, San Quentin, California, Respondent.

Misc. No. 416.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 9, 1955.

Richard Jensen, in pro. per.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and BONE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Applicant, now in custody pursuant to a judgment of conviction by a court of the State of California, applies to this court for a writ of habeas corpus. This court has no jurisdiction to entertain the application and it is ordered dismissed. 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 F.2d 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-jensen-applicant-v-h-o-teets-warden-california-state-prison-ca9-1955.