Richard James Johnson v. Michael Venable
Opinion
A-pp^k. i If DEC 302013 S SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS vc,. ' " & SE\/FMTfrDlST(eiCfPEGGYCULP
A-^ptU^xLS •* PoTT£f? COUNT/ Mormu FD2 EvrENmu
_^ OF
„ Time ^ IbTtfEl K6N(6f?AkU? ^ukCE (sf SAID C0U(cT. Coi^tS WCiyi APPELLATE fcU\l,u^^ pr^( V
i. Tk«_ CxArl or^r rezjutrsr^ TWcdockaiuj sJedeW/vl- uj^S> 2.Th* A-ppJLk uUt n*>i be aU* J_* If/^k 4A*. 3. ApO-e.lU!U_ I.S r<LQutej>Uss(k Cx 20 lay -eyC\\&-\Qjs csrf
>^5o
\
CL6 °
1-1
S - o
0
^J ^
til ••* ,t CM
c
o
"*>l
N
^
* e£-H^4
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richard James Johnson v. Michael Venable, (Tex. 2013).
Richard James Johnson v. Michael Venable (Richard James Johnson v. Michael Venable) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.