Richard Jadoosingh v. Tara NGL Pipeline Company, LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas

Richard Jadoosingh v. Tara NGL Pipeline Company, LLC

DecidedJune 28, 2018

Docket14-18-00187-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Richard Jadoosingh v. Tara NGL Pipeline Company, LLC (Richard Jadoosingh v. Tara NGL Pipeline Company, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richard Jadoosingh v. Tara NGL Pipeline Company, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Order filed June 28, 2018.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-18-00187-CV ____________

RICHARD JADOOSINGH, Appellant

V.

TARA NGL PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1102402

ORDER

On June 15, 2018, appellant filed a brief that is not in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1

Accordingly, we strike appellant’s brief filed June 15, 2018, and we order appellant to file a brief that complies with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure within ten days of the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1. If appellant files another brief that does not comply with Rule 38.1, the court may strike the brief, prohibit appellant from filing another, and proceed as if appellant had failed to file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(a). Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a), where an appellant has failed to file a brief, we may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. If appellant fails to timely file a brief in accordance with Rule 38, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order filed June 28, 2018.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-18-00187-CV ____________

RICHARD JADOOSINGH, Appellant

V.

TARA NGL PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1102402

ORDER

On June 15, 2018, appellant filed a brief that is not in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1

Accordingly, we strike appellant’s brief filed June 15, 2018, and we order appellant to file a brief that complies with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure within ten days of the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1. If appellant files another brief that does not comply with Rule 38.1, the court may strike the brief, prohibit appellant from filing another, and proceed as if appellant had failed to file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(a). Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a), where an appellant has failed to file a brief, we may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. If appellant fails to timely file a brief in accordance with Rule 38, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Richard Jadoosingh v. Tara NGL Pipeline Company, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-jadoosingh-v-tara-ngl-pipeline-company-llc-texapp-2018.