Richard J. Zenteno v. Autoland Scientech USA, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 4, 2018·No. 03-16-00599-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-16-00599-CV

Richard J. Zenteno, Appellant v.

Autoland Scientech USA, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 15-0672-C26, THE HONORABLE DONNA GAYLE KING, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal was suspended in 2016 after the Court received notice of a related bankruptcy and its automatic stay of this appellate proceeding. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.1, 8.2. After the case was suspended, no party to this appeal sought reinstatement. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. We have now been informed that the bankruptcy case related to this appeal is closed, and therefore, we have reinstated the appeal.

On August 28, 2018, the Clerk of this Court sent notice to the parties that this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless a status report was filed on or before September 7, 2018, that provided reason to retain this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). Appellant Richard J. Zenteno responded that the parties have resolved their dispute and that he wishes to withdraw the appeal and has no objection to its dismissal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

Cindy Olson Bourland, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: October 4, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard J. Zenteno v. Autoland Scientech USA, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Richard J. Zenteno v. Autoland Scientech USA, Inc. (Richard J. Zenteno v. Autoland Scientech USA, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.