Richard J. Stuart v. Warren Pinto, Superintendent, N. J. State Prison — Rahway

Third Circuit

Richard J. Stuart v. Warren Pinto, Superintendent, N. J. State Prison — Rahway

419 F.2d 126, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9833

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedDecember 3, 1969

Docket20-1087

StatusPublished

This text of 419 F.2d 126 (Richard J. Stuart v. Warren Pinto, Superintendent, N. J. State Prison — Rahway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richard J. Stuart v. Warren Pinto, Superintendent, N. J. State Prison — Rahway, 419 F.2d 126, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9833 (3d Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

419 F.2d 126

Richard J. STUART, Appellant,
v.
Warren PINTO, Superintendent, N. J. State Prison — Rahway.

No. 17799.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Submitted on Briefs October 20, 1969.

Decided December 3, 1969.

Richard J. Stuart, pro se.

Eugene T. Urbaniak, Deputy Atty. Gen., Trenton, N. J., for appellee.

Before KALODNER, STALEY and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This is an action under the Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 1981 et seq.) brought by appellant against the Superintendent of the New Jersey State Prison at Rahway, New Jersey. The district court, in an opinion presently unreported, dismissed the action.

The complaint in substance deals with certain prison regulations and conduct by prison officials in general terms inadequate to establish a right to relief.

We therefore will affirm the dismissal of the complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI