Richard J. Daigle v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.
This text of 325 F.2d 716 (Richard J. Daigle v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, seeking the reversal of a jury verdict against him, complains that the trial judge erroneously instructed the jury as to “unseaworthiness”. The record does not reveal any objection to any charge having been made by appellant. However, we have examined the complained of instruction and find no prejudicial error. The judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
325 F.2d 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-j-daigle-v-j-ray-mcdermott-co-inc-ca5-1964.