Richard J. Daigle v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.
325 F.2d 716
Opinion
The appellant, seeking the reversal of a jury verdict against him, complains that the trial judge erroneously instructed the jury as to “unseaworthiness”. The record does not reveal any objection to any charge having been made by appellant. However, we have examined the complained of instruction and find no prejudicial error. The judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richard J. Daigle v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., 325 F.2d 716 (5th Cir. 1964).
325 F.2d 716 (Richard J. Daigle v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rush O. Nichols v. United States
325 F.2d 716 (Fifth Circuit, 1964)