Richard Hurles v. Charles L. Ryan

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richard Hurles v. Charles L. Ryan. Read the opinion of the Court — 752 F.3d 768
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 19, 2013·No. 08-99032·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD D. HURLES, No. 08-99032 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CIV-00-0118-PHX-RCB District of Arizona, CHARLES L. RYAN , Phoenix Respondent-Appellee. ORDER

Filed March 19, 2013

Before: Harry Pregerson, Dorothy W. Nelson, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The Court takes the respondent’s Motion for Ruling on Respondent-Appellees’ Petition for Rehearing En Banc and the petitioner’s Motion to remand pursuant to Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S.Ct. 1309 (2012), under submission. The Court defers ruling on these motions pending the resolution of Detrich v. Ryan, No. 08-99001.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Hurles v. Charles L. Ryan, (9th Cir. 2013).

Richard Hurles v. Charles L. Ryan (Richard Hurles v. Charles L. Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martinez v. Ryan
132 S. Ct. 1309 (Supreme Court, 2012)