Richard Hart v. United States

533 F. App'x 694
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 7, 2013·No. 12-3699·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Richard Hart appeals the district court’s 1 adverse judgment following a bench trial in his Federal Tort Claims Act lawsuit. We decline to consider Hart’s sole argument for reversal as it is based on an issue not raised below, and it does not fall under the recognized exceptions for entertaining new arguments. See Henning v. Mainstreet Bank, 538 F.3d 975, 979 (8th Cir.2008). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Hart v. United States, 533 F. App'x 694 (8th Cir. 2013).

533 F. App'x 694 (Richard Hart v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henning v. Mainstreet Bank
538 F.3d 975 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)