Richard Hart v. United States

Eighth Circuit

Richard Hart v. United States

533 F. App'x 694

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedOctober 7, 2013

Docket12-3699

StatusUnpublished

This text of 533 F. App'x 694 (Richard Hart v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richard Hart v. United States, 533 F. App'x 694 (8th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Richard Hart appeals the district court’s 1 adverse judgment following a bench trial in his Federal Tort Claims Act lawsuit. We decline to consider Hart’s sole argument for reversal as it is based on an issue not raised below, and it does not fall under the recognized exceptions for entertaining new arguments. See Henning v. Mainstreet Bank, 538 F.3d 975, 979 (8th Cir.2008). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Richard Hart appeals the district court’s 1 adverse judgment following a bench trial in his Federal Tort Claims Act lawsuit. We decline to consider Hart’s sole argument for reversal as it is based on an issue not raised below, and it does not fall under the recognized exceptions for entertaining new arguments. See Henning v. Mainstreet Bank, 538 F.3d 975, 979 (8th Cir.2008). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

533 F. App'x 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-hart-v-united-states-ca8-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack