Home/D.C. Circuit/Richard H. Davis v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General, United States Post Office Department

Richard H. Davis v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General, United States Post Office Department

219 F.2d 510, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 78
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 17, 1955
Docket12409
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 219 F.2d 510 (Richard H. Davis v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General, United States Post Office Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richard H. Davis v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General, United States Post Office Department, 219 F.2d 510, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 78 (D.C. Cir. 1955).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Richard H. Davis, was dismissed by the Post Office Department in 1935 pursuant to charges preferred against him. In his suit for re-instatement, filed May 3, 1954, the District Court correctly granted summary judgment to the Postmaster General because of the appellant’s laches.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leland A. Chappelle v. Dudley C. Sharp, Secretary of the Department of the Air Force
301 F.2d 506 (D.C. Circuit, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 F.2d 510, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-h-davis-v-arthur-e-summerfield-postmaster-general-united-cadc-1955.