Richard Guy Jensen v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 24, 2015·No. 03-15-00283-CR·Published

Opinion

J^V Mte/7,6*o&

dk^ /yVpO

AUG 2 4 Z015 kTHlRO COURT OfAPPEALS \ JffFREYD.KYlE /

-Uf- $*':-£e&*cj^ sM •ju

^/iOtM^ ^ZZ&GturtcJ

/m%i

4^ /h&4.

£c*fcv

c^.^4^_s^.._jfijd:

^wJis

f^%k

^

/i*%

CAU5£ A/a, totiq £XPa*.T£T I ZN TH£ 42t>±^ * JuDlClAl* SlCHAfiO CcUY j£MZ£A/ | lS\&TRlC.T COuKT | B£LL COUAfTV TEXAS

NA&BAS CaR.?a% / DISTRICT COUG.T

TO T#£ rt&NbHA&LB JvbCxE OF Said CouultS C-O/ViEs AVW HiCUAe.^jGlUY' J~e/*S£A/ APPLICANT AA/D PtffcSuAWT 7Z3 ^AT/CLE **.05* 72"*AS £oD£ &F C&Mlfi/AL. VHCC£T»A*£- _• Atf.TiCLLE.lj XE&r/OA/ IZ. j Texas COA/STtTUTtoA/'/ Ats/b AZn-clc. 5 * SECt/on 8 , T£XAS CousrnUTVafiJ'-» P&E&eA/T this APPlicATioaJ Fa/t KaiH.it af Habeas noCPu&% See/ttA/G, Te QBTAlK/ A CAMPLE.TB CoP/ OF ///S T&AL. ££££>£/) S W/THoaT CtXST «

X -

tTuftlZHlGTICN

PdASUA/vr TO ARTICLECS) it - <3l AMO W.OZ t TeXAS CADE OF CQiN\tNA\- F>foe££iu1l£ j THIS C&UlKT Hm.£ Ju&tSQl£.r/0sS TO GrSArt TNG R.EUaf K£Ckue.ST£Ux //£&£!/>/- /r* PAKTG: CANTU* *kl3 SW. 1.d Tat GTlEX.APP.—

xc

SPECIAL. SnATBM£.T TD THE C&U.AT

AppucaiJT /s At/ /h/bt&eirr j lav/ha*/ &f the lai*j> AcziiJg witmcut Cour se/, j Afiib AS. 3U£# *£.<Qu eSTS TMll COu£T A/OT 72> /MfhSE UP&A/ HIM TH£ SAm£ HlBeH STA*/bAO.& oF Ltf&AL AST WMcH tvilGjJT &C PLAO£b tfi/ A PLefl&MQr VtepAtzea am Fil£0 MALEAft*/fb A»eM3fifi- af t»£-8a&. .applicant fii/m*- FM. TZECxUZSTS T/MT 7*,* CAuAT kv,t<. C*A*S,Zb*. TW/S V&O-SC AVOCADO* ,U A MA^A/£A THAT iAt.LL. Do Su^TAVTiAL UUSTll^, ^tN- A MEASU** OF- T&L£tLA>*i(LG* PuR&uaaJt 7» MtZ/l/tS "V. ^CE&NEA. v 92. S CT 5"«W 11*12-)*

'RECEivSM AUG 24ZM5 1

i ^ * v»«sr>

fbk. His use. in V(leJ?a^a/& a i>o5r- co»<\/ioticW wRit rsF Habeas C/B&PU.S / APPLICANT UtEALtESTS. THAT /~fE SE V«ci\/lb£.D WiTW A <La?S r>F THE £o/Mf>LET£ /TZ/AL. HECO&& lAIClaDlNG j 'BUT NOT U#\,T£D TO *• AiL fHSlcTAiEA/rS / AblUA/SlSt/Au-A/T- BS THE Colter i TUE ArGulME-sITS oF TA/& STATE j /VfCT/OA/S j £oa/ffssio/v3 .. STATEMEn/TS £>F~/ZteTZ'j rtezP- SJ?tvTAA//U? /H\/BST/£rAT/OA/ j AtJQ ALL CtTHEO. "pArPFXs &LEQ /=&WW HlS CJL»mia/AL TElAri- STA-T&Q TITLED / THE STATE OF 7ZTAVJ5 vfe&SES KxUiA&Xi, &ui/ sJea/sea/ Cause: a/c). Totto AS A*J ALteR.NATI VZ Td Sl/Wfl/V E*?ltJGr <:PttnVlA£2> A C&Ry £>F TY/E COMPLETE THiAL f&CofU) j APPUCAa/T t*/GulJ> KeQiaEsTT THiOT A/E BE &U/EA/ 7^/E L&AtJ aF--r**asc. Recoiils ft>/z A Reasonable lehgth a f tiaaej AvcouhsrABLE THiicaj&H y/f£ z/SKakzaa/ oF THE 7D.C. J. "Pack*! LxhTT We&£ tiECug&u- T*Y HaUsED . SEE t&f Rf CHRlSTEHSEA/ 39 S-W.3<* IS® . CTeX. AFP. AmARI - UC 2£Oo) 4

ARGUMENT & AUTHORITY

"Due Tb Hts Pave*tVj applicant /s u«/Aki£. rz> 7>Ay r&L A do£V of the fntutPl£T£ TRIAL. &ECCtii)'S , DlSC&'BE/i ABdi/E , WMlcN HE X£Z3ut?£S » A A roMDLBTe CoP</ &F SAiQ 7X/AL. Rec&RCIS. AfiE ESKEsvTt^L T& APPUrAtJT Foil H/s use tN s££*r/*sG Vc^r- CoAji/tcT/c*/ fez /£Fr y^sn ^ slu?a+, HE /S FA/T,rLEd 73 HE PXaViO&A THE SAME. AT Ho C~Cv-, AS Th> {****&y wtTU J&ue 7&t±c/£3s 7X*r ST*4TE At^tT Paa.Ut'hE 4*/ ///D»S*vr/l TZA&LrcKtfiT <aF Hi* TRIAL WUE££ JL/& AliEa,£S% EiP£0.i/^£L «£-*>**»*> /V^.A^ TE,*£ TZ&C — OrttK UitUL T>£m*a/¥*AT - IaJ fi£ <?e&,A/AT)*> 9SSO S.\rt. 2d CQl CTEX . ApP* - Sa-a/-At/Tina I99&) i ^SCa^i! \r. STATE j 88to S.hs. 2m1 tSZ (TEX. Aff . rtOLtlT&tS Xfit- l>"T. /993^' JPau-nr V. -B>\ACMQu&»s , <49& F. Zd &7SCi<i&cJ ' SMiTU "V. -EEA/A/ETE y &2 S.Ct »95"C/9iUl3 . M&eE APPLICANT A4AX2S 7WE F&LLO - uitnc* SPe/liFIc claims* Aa/H Aszerrr TMtr twei/ Are Xiem&mstEtfa 6»y THE ra/Utfl/ETE Tt/Al- feCGrta .

2. OF </

Clj AMUCAtfr CLAIMS HE /s /aVA/OCEa/7-fsF THE aFFEAKLE oF (LaAiV^cTIa a/ CAUSE A/a. TOTfO J .-4a/a ASSB-UrS TTSAT TH£ TKlAL f?BCaaQS UOtfl D£/Ws»

OA/STIIA7E TO THE FMOTj StATiHGt /J/i I a/T£aJTioH oF Ft I if/& A fbSTQoM~ Vicr/a*/ w£/t car /i!a&£a* coePu& a&seht/aAs am a<etua\x /A/A/ac£As&& &LAlAr\ ,

CI} APPLicaa/t- Claims that tue PxcsegutioaJ usetd Pee-iuheD test/aioaw OF THE STATE l^lTA/^^SLS 7T> ©fe.TA>A/ A C&n/iS ifET? £iA/ A&AlHsT H/AS-

All. Apo&sAib claims A4e Stt'BsTATi/H- /*/ the Complete tx/al &£CL&ebS A\HD WILL BE THE GsfouAJbS £>F APPLICANT PaST-CoMtETiCsH' tHUlT , A-S SUCH j /a/ LiOHT OF SucU A S//GK/SA/G s TMr Ua/iTEO state.? •SuPf?£A*E. cou&t Mas f?ui£a -rH*4T / T / s t h a t wh&h >a

A/£fr7J fh£ A TOAa/scJUVT *a/AiibErP. T& CollateHakll y Attac.1? a

CatsJK/lCTiOtJ /^ SU*.i«JJU EoLtAL. PREXECTig*/ A$/T> ~bc*E fbeXUTSS REiSijiHF THE S7&TE To F/j/Za//SU AtJ ±A/VlG€.ffl PAiSOaIEa* Su&H TKAa/~ ScJLi i*r w it«6 let chae&e . CrAfJbAjee. w: Ca\h fozaIia . g H 5. ct. 5S0 Cl96>S),

3 OF A

PRAYFR

iHHE&EF&AE , T&EMlSES C&Al*ll*E(£EbJ APPj-icaaJT PRaSS THiS CGutPr Li/lL'L. CGN&lhEG. THE Z/IFO&AAATIAAJ PEESEATEb HEES/AJ AJh VdiLL GGfiMT TZSsS lA/t?lT APOUCATlOAJ y C3£DE£IA/<3r TA/E GFJF/C/AL CauOT PEDaHTeS

AHb/ad THE CLEHIC OF Th£ CotAJtr J T& PtfCiVIkE APPLiCA>AJT KAIiTM A 60PH OP- THE EulutPLCTE TAT/A./L H^COHI\S AT NO COST, Oft /A/ TUE ALTEt- RHATIt/E TO MAKE AfiAtAtJ&IUlEA/TS TA/EoU&H TA/E 7TL).c.jr. pACJi. **± CAM tT LA*/ Et^dAHY Fb*> APPLlCAAlT T& BE EOAtoBA SAlb REEcULbS FcMZ

A ?JZAS>oHa&L£ EEsVOrTAi OF T/A4E .

Ce.fiTlF(CATE OF SE/LVIC^E

X MEAE&y CERTIFY THAT AA/ 77//S L^AY OF jZOIS's A TRUE Aht£> CoilHECT CoiL* OF TH/S IHfilT OF HABEAS CadPWi //.^S" WAS /MAIL£d 7Z> CIEEAT JOAHUA.*&TAT6H &ELE L*£?Un/T</J DISTRICT CGuAT t$E/.TaA/'7&XAS *76»S J3

RlCHAfib &UY J&tfSEA/

{HALLACE PACK. LfA/*T 2HCG WALLACE PACK Rq. A/AHA SCTA/ TX. 77S&B

</ OF A

*)£"

xT" ^s

N ^ ">©

N/ a

25

i I NC

k ><*

1
f

J3n.

u <

m

«-»•

M in *. »..i

& x

f i <y

/

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Guy Jensen v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Richard Guy Jensen v. State (Richard Guy Jensen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.