Richard Goldberg v. EMR (USA Holdings) Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 29, 2018·No. 05-18-00261-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered June 29, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00261-CV

RICHARD GOLDBERG, ET AL, Appellants V.

EMR (USA HOLDINGS) INC., ET AL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-14064

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown

By letter dated April 5, 2018, we questioned our jurisdiction over the conditional cross-

appeal filed in this interlocutory appeal from an order denying appellants’ motion to dismiss under chapter 27 of the civil practice and remedies code. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 27.003 (West 2015). The cross-appeal challenges two orders denying discovery.

Having reviewed the jurisdictional briefing filed by the parties at our request and applicable authorities, we conclude we lack jurisdiction over the cross-appeal. Accordingly, the cross-appeal is DISMISSED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Minett v. Snowden, No. 05-18-00003- CV, 2018 WL 2929339, at *11-12 (Tex. App.—Dallas June 12, 2018, no pet. h.).

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Goldberg v. EMR (USA Holdings) Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Richard Goldberg v. EMR (USA Holdings) Inc. (Richard Goldberg v. EMR (USA Holdings) Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 27.003
Texas CP § 27.003