Richard Goldberg v. EMR (USA Holdings) Inc.
Opinion
Order entered June 29, 2018
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00261-CV
RICHARD GOLDBERG, ET AL, Appellants
V.
EMR (USA HOLDINGS) INC., ET AL, Appellees
On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-14064
ORDER Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown
By letter dated April 5, 2018, we questioned our jurisdiction over the conditional cross-
appeal filed in this interlocutory appeal from an order denying appellants’ motion to dismiss
under chapter 27 of the civil practice and remedies code. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE
ANN. § 27.003 (West 2015). The cross-appeal challenges two orders denying discovery.
Having reviewed the jurisdictional briefing filed by the parties at our request and
applicable authorities, we conclude we lack jurisdiction over the cross-appeal. Accordingly, the
cross-appeal is DISMISSED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Minett v. Snowden, No. 05-18-00003-
CV, 2018 WL 2929339, at *11-12 (Tex. App.—Dallas June 12, 2018, no pet. h.).
/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richard Goldberg v. EMR (USA Holdings) Inc. (Richard Goldberg v. EMR (USA Holdings) Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.