Richard Goldberg v. EMR (USA Holdings) Inc.
This text of Richard Goldberg v. EMR (USA Holdings) Inc. (Richard Goldberg v. EMR (USA Holdings) Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered June 29, 2018
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00261-CV
RICHARD GOLDBERG, ET AL, Appellants
V.
EMR (USA HOLDINGS) INC., ET AL, Appellees
On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-14064
ORDER Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown
By letter dated April 5, 2018, we questioned our jurisdiction over the conditional cross-
appeal filed in this interlocutory appeal from an order denying appellants’ motion to dismiss
under chapter 27 of the civil practice and remedies code. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE
ANN. § 27.003 (West 2015). The cross-appeal challenges two orders denying discovery.
Having reviewed the jurisdictional briefing filed by the parties at our request and
applicable authorities, we conclude we lack jurisdiction over the cross-appeal. Accordingly, the
cross-appeal is DISMISSED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Minett v. Snowden, No. 05-18-00003-
CV, 2018 WL 2929339, at *11-12 (Tex. App.—Dallas June 12, 2018, no pet. h.).
/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richard Goldberg v. EMR (USA Holdings) Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-goldberg-v-emr-usa-holdings-inc-texapp-2018.