Richard Gerzin v. Dr. George J. Beto

459 F.2d 671, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10088
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 13, 1972·No. 72-1240·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is taken from an order of the district court denying the habeas petition of a Texas state prisoner. We vacate and remand.

The habeas corpus petition filed by appellant presented matters which could only be determined from the record of the state trial, or failing that, after an evidentiary hearing in the district court. The petition was denied by the district court, on the recommendation of a magistrate, without an evidentiary hearing and without the benefit of the record of the state proceedings.

The judgment is therefore vacated and the cause remanded to enable the district court to view the state records and, if necessary, hold an evidentiary hearing to evaluate the appellant’s allegations. Brooks v. Smith, 5 Cir., 1970, 429 F.2d 1281; Hollingshead v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1970, 423 F.2d 1059.

Vacated and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Gerzin v. Dr. George J. Beto, 459 F.2d 671, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10088 (5th Cir. 1972).

459 F.2d 671 (Richard Gerzin v. Dr. George J. Beto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

James T. Caver v. State of Alabama
511 F.2d 124 (Fifth Circuit, 1975)
Early Lowe v. State of Alabama
487 F.2d 337 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)
Curtis Lee Jones v. Dr. George J. Beto
459 F.2d 979 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)