Richard Gayer v. State Bar of California

Ninth Circuit

Richard Gayer v. State Bar of California

73 F.3d 368, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40805, 1995 WL 755620

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedDecember 19, 1995

Docket94-16552

StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 368 (Richard Gayer v. State Bar of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richard Gayer v. State Bar of California, 73 F.3d 368, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40805, 1995 WL 755620 (9th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

73 F.3d 368
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Richard GAYER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-16552.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 4, 1995.*
Decided Dec. 19, 1995.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, THOMPSON, Circuit Judge, and THOMPSON,** District Judge.

ORDER

We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, with the exception that we hold the dismissal to be without prejudice. See Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678 (1946); Cook v. Peter Kiewit Sons Co., 775 F.2d 1030, 1035 (9th Cir.1985).

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4

**

Honorable Gordon Thompson, Jr., United States District Judge, Southern District of California, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI