Richard G. Brock v. Tony Gammon, Superintendent, Moberly Correctional Center William L. Webster, Attorney General, State of Missouri

5 F.3d 531, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30202, 1993 WL 361905
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 20, 1993
Docket93-1924
StatusPublished

This text of 5 F.3d 531 (Richard G. Brock v. Tony Gammon, Superintendent, Moberly Correctional Center William L. Webster, Attorney General, State of Missouri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richard G. Brock v. Tony Gammon, Superintendent, Moberly Correctional Center William L. Webster, Attorney General, State of Missouri, 5 F.3d 531, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30202, 1993 WL 361905 (8th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

5 F.3d 531
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Richard G. BROCK, Appellant,
v.
Tony GAMMON, Superintendent, Moberly Correctional Center;
William L. Webster, Attorney General, State of
Missouri, Appellees.

No. 93-1924.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: September 15, 1993.
Filed: September 20, 1993.

Before FAGG, Circuit Judge, HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Richard G. Brock, a state prisoner, appeals from the judgment of the District Court1 denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The gravamen of his claim is an alleged conflict of interest on the part of his counsel on direct appeal from his state court conviction. After an evidentiary hearing, the District Court found that the alleged conflict was illusory and that Brock's petition should be denied.

Having thoroughly reviewed the case, we are satisfied that the facts found by the District Court are not clearly erroneous and that Brock has not shown he is entitled to habeas relief. As an opinion would lack precedential value, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed without opinion.

AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable Russell G. Clark, Senior United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 F.3d 531, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30202, 1993 WL 361905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-g-brock-v-tony-gammon-superintendent-mober-ca8-1993.