Richard Folsom and Becky Folsom v. Pool Quest, LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 3, 2010·No. 02-09-00409-CV·Published

Opinion

                                COURT OF APPEALS

                                                 SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                                FORT WORTH

                                                 NO. 2-09-409-CV

RICHARD FOLSOM AND BECKY FOLSOM                                      APPELLANTS

                                                             V.

POOL QUEST, LLC                                                                              APPELLEE

                                                        ----------

             FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

                    MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

We have considered AAppellants= Motion To Dismiss For Mootness.@  It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  June 3, 2010



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Folsom and Becky Folsom v. Pool Quest, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Richard Folsom and Becky Folsom v. Pool Quest, LLC (Richard Folsom and Becky Folsom v. Pool Quest, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.