Richard Fields v. City of Philadelphia

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richard Fields v. City of Philadelphia. Read the opinion of the Court — 862 F.3d 353
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided July 13, 2017·No. 16-1650·Published

Opinion

PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________

No. 16-1650 ________________

RICHARD FIELDS, Appellant

v.

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; SISCA, POLICE OFFICER, BADGE NO. 9547; JOE DOE, AN UNKNOWN PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER ________________

No. 16-1651 ________________

AMANDA GERACI, Appellant

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; DAWN BROWN, POLICE OFFICER, BADGE NO. 2454; TERRA M. BARROW, POLICE OFFICER, BADGE NO. 1147; NIKKI L. JONES, POLICE OFFICER, BADGE NO. 2549; RHONDA SMITH, POLICE OFFICER, BADGE NO. 1373 ________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action Nos. 2-14-cv-04424/05264) District Judge: Honorable Mark A. Kearney ________________ Before: AMBRO, RESTREPO, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

The Court has been made aware of a typographical error in the opinion entered on July 7, 2017. Accordingly, it is O R D E R E D that sentence on page 19, paragraph 1, line 11 of the opinion should read:

Notably, the plaintiff in Fordyce [v. City of Seattle, 55 F.3d 436 (9th Cir. 1995)] claimed he was recording a public protest for a local news station.”); …

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk Date: July 13, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Fields v. City of Philadelphia, (3d Cir. 2017).

Richard Fields v. City of Philadelphia (Richard Fields v. City of Philadelphia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fordyce v. City of Seattle
55 F.3d 436 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)