Richard Ellis v. S.R. Witkowski, Warden Attorney General of South Carolina

875 F.2d 314, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6625, 1989 WL 54080
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 17, 1989
Docket89-7022
StatusUnpublished

This text of 875 F.2d 314 (Richard Ellis v. S.R. Witkowski, Warden Attorney General of South Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richard Ellis v. S.R. Witkowski, Warden Attorney General of South Carolina, 875 F.2d 314, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6625, 1989 WL 54080 (4th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

875 F.2d 314
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Richard ELLIS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
S.R. WITKOWSKI, Warden; Attorney General of South Carolina,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 89-7022.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 27, 1989.
Decided: May 17, 1989.

Richard Ellis, appellant pro se.

Donald John Zelenka (Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina), for appellees.

Before K.K. HALL, MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Ellis seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Ellis v. Witkowski, C/A No. 3:88-1832 (D.S.C. Dec. 15, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fleek (Lena Albert) v. O'DOnnell (Gerald M.)
875 F.2d 314 (Fourth Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
875 F.2d 314, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6625, 1989 WL 54080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-ellis-v-sr-witkowski-warden-attorney-general-of-south-carolina-ca4-1989.