Richard Elder v. State of Florida
This text of Richard Elder v. State of Florida (Richard Elder v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D18-2884 _____________________________
RICHARD ELDER,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for writ of habeas corpus—Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel.
March 11, 2019
PER CURIAM.
The petition is denied on the merits.
ROWE, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Deana Marshall, Riverview, for Petitioner. Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richard Elder v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-elder-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.