Richard Elbert Stokes, IV and Kathleen Woodard Stokes v. Atmos Energy Corporation

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: November 20, 2024
• Docket: 12-24-00266-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

NO. 12-24-00266-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

RICHARD ELBERT STOKES, IV AND § APPEAL FROM THE KATHLEEN WOODARD STOKES, APPELLANTS § COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 V.

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION, § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM

Appellants, Richard Elbert Stokes, IV and Kathleen Woodard Stokes, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion states that the parties reached an agreement, and this appeal is no longer necessary. No decision has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly, Appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Costs are taxed against the party incurring same.

Opinion delivered November 20, 2022. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

NOVEMBER 20, 2024

RICHARD ELBERT STOKES, IV AND KATHLEEN WOODARD STOKES, Appellants V. ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION, Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law No 3 of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 76003-B)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellants to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance. Costs are taxed against the party incurring same.

By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.