RICHARD E. WARNER AND JOHN W. PARENTE, etc. v. CITY OF MARATHON, etc.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed January 4, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D22-967 Lower Tribunal No. 18-222-M ________________
Richard E. Warner and John W. Parente, etc., et al., Appellants,
vs.
City of Marathon, etc., Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Mark H. Jones, Judge.
John P. Fenner (Weston), for appellant Ardolino Estate; Margaret A. Broz (West Palm Beach), for appellant Joseph E. Ardolino.
Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & Hochman, P.A. and Jeffrey L. Hochman and Hudson C. Gill (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and LINDSEY, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Penn Cent. Transp. Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104,
131 (1978) (the fact that a regulation causes a diminution in the property
value alone does not establish a taking).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
RICHARD E. WARNER AND JOHN W. PARENTE, etc. v. CITY OF MARATHON, etc. (RICHARD E. WARNER AND JOHN W. PARENTE, etc. v. CITY OF MARATHON, etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.