RICHARD E. WARNER AND JOHN W. PARENTE, etc. v. CITY OF MARATHON, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

RICHARD E. WARNER AND JOHN W. PARENTE, etc. v. CITY OF MARATHON, etc.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 4, 2023

Docket22-0967

StatusPublished

This text of RICHARD E. WARNER AND JOHN W. PARENTE, etc. v. CITY OF MARATHON, etc. (RICHARD E. WARNER AND JOHN W. PARENTE, etc. v. CITY OF MARATHON, etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

RICHARD E. WARNER AND JOHN W. PARENTE, etc. v. CITY OF MARATHON, etc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed January 4, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-967 Lower Tribunal No. 18-222-M ________________

Richard E. Warner and John W. Parente, etc., et al., Appellants,

vs.

City of Marathon, etc., Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Mark H. Jones, Judge.

John P. Fenner (Weston), for appellant Ardolino Estate; Margaret A. Broz (West Palm Beach), for appellant Joseph E. Ardolino.

Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & Hochman, P.A. and Jeffrey L. Hochman and Hudson C. Gill (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Penn Cent. Transp. Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104,

131 (1978) (the fact that a regulation causes a diminution in the property

value alone does not establish a taking).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI