Richard E. Daniel v. Robert Adams, Warden

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 25, 2016
DocketA17A0007
StatusPublished

This text of Richard E. Daniel v. Robert Adams, Warden (Richard E. Daniel v. Robert Adams, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richard E. Daniel v. Robert Adams, Warden, (Ga. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ August 11, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0007. RICHARD E. DANIEL v. ROBERT ADAMS, WARDEN.

The trial court denied Richard E. Daniel’s habeas corpus petition. Daniel then filed a “Motion to Set Aside Void Judgment,” which the trial court construed as a motion for reconsideration and likewise denied. Daniel now appeals to this Court. We, however, lack jurisdiction. The underlying subject matter of an appeal controls over the relief sought in determining the proper appellate procedure. Rebich v. Miles, 264 Ga. 467 (448 SE2d 192) (1994). The underlying subject matter of this appeal is habeas corpus. Because the Supreme Court has jurisdiction over appeals in habeas corpus cases, see Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Para. III (4), Daniel’s appeal is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 08/11/2016 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rebich v. Miles
448 S.E.2d 192 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Richard E. Daniel v. Robert Adams, Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-e-daniel-v-robert-adams-warden-gactapp-2016.