Richard Debenedetto v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Richard Debenedetto v. State

DecidedJune 30, 2015

Docket04-15-00166-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Richard Debenedetto v. State (Richard Debenedetto v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richard Debenedetto v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 29, 2015

No. 04-15-00165-CR, 04-15-00166-CR, 04-15-00167-CR, 04-15-0068-CR, 04-15-00169-CR, and 04-15-00170-CR

Richard DEBENEDETTO, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. A1481, A1482, A1483, A1484, A1485, and A1486 Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

ORDER The court has examined the clerk’s records in Nos. 04-15-00165-CR, 04-15-00166-CR, 04-15-00167-CR, 04-15-00168-CR, 04-15-00169-CR, and 04-15-00170-CR, and is of the opinion that, in the interest of efficient administration, they should be consolidated for purposes of briefing and argument.

We, therefore, ORDER Nos. 04-15-00165-CR, 04-15-00166-CR, 04-15-00167-CR, 04- 15-00168-CR, 04-15-00169-CR, and 04-15-00170-CR, consolidated for purposes of briefing and argument on appeal. The parties must file motions, briefs, and other pleadings as if the appeals were one but put all appeal numbers in the style of the case. However, a record must be filed in each appeal, the record in each case will remain separate and, if supplementation of the record becomes necessary, the supplemental material must be filed in the appeal to which it applies. The cases must be argued together in one brief, as in a single appeal, and if oral argument is requested and granted, the entire case must be argued as a single appeal, with the total time limit for each party equal to the ordinary time limit for a single appeal. The court will dispose of the appeals with the same judgment, opinion, and mandate. This order does not extend the briefing schedule.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 29th day of June, 2015.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 29, 2015

No. 04-15-00165-CR, 04-15-00166-CR, 04-15-00167-CR, 04-15-0068-CR, 04-15-00169-CR, and 04-15-00170-CR

Richard DEBENEDETTO, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. A1481, A1482, A1483, A1484, A1485, and A1486 Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

ORDER The court has examined the clerk’s records in Nos. 04-15-00165-CR, 04-15-00166-CR, 04-15-00167-CR, 04-15-00168-CR, 04-15-00169-CR, and 04-15-00170-CR, and is of the opinion that, in the interest of efficient administration, they should be consolidated for purposes of briefing and argument.

We, therefore, ORDER Nos. 04-15-00165-CR, 04-15-00166-CR, 04-15-00167-CR, 04- 15-00168-CR, 04-15-00169-CR, and 04-15-00170-CR, consolidated for purposes of briefing and argument on appeal. The parties must file motions, briefs, and other pleadings as if the appeals were one but put all appeal numbers in the style of the case. However, a record must be filed in each appeal, the record in each case will remain separate and, if supplementation of the record becomes necessary, the supplemental material must be filed in the appeal to which it applies. The cases must be argued together in one brief, as in a single appeal, and if oral argument is requested and granted, the entire case must be argued as a single appeal, with the total time limit for each party equal to the ordinary time limit for a single appeal. The court will dispose of the appeals with the same judgment, opinion, and mandate. This order does not extend the briefing schedule.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 29th day of June, 2015.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Richard Debenedetto v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-debenedetto-v-state-texapp-2015.