Richard Dean Kercheff v. State
This text of Richard Dean Kercheff v. State (Richard Dean Kercheff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-12-00166-CR
Richard Dean Kercheff, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 67894, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Following a bench trial, appellant Richard Dean Kercheff was convicted of the
offense of burglary of a building and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. This appeal followed.
Appellant’s appointed counsel, Mr. W.W. Torrey, has filed a motion to withdraw accompanied by
a brief concluding that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967). However, before counsel filed his Anders brief, he was elected the District Attorney
of Milam County, and his term commenced effective January 1, 2013. In similar cases involving
Mr. Torrey, this Court has abated the appeal and remanded the cause to the trial court for
consideration of whether counsel should be allowed to withdraw.1
1 See Parker v. State, No. 03-12-00540-CR, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 1587, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Austin Feb. 20, 2013, no pet. h.) (per curiam) (not designated for publication); Williamson v. State, No. 03-12-00672-CR, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 811, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 25, 2013, no pet. h.) (not designated for publication); Smalls v. State, No. 03-12-00241-CR, We will do the same here. If the district court determines that good cause exists to
relieve counsel of his duties and replace him with substitute counsel, the district court shall permit
counsel to withdraw and promptly appoint substitute counsel for the appeal of this cause. A copy
of the court’s order appointing substitute counsel and the court’s order granting counsel’s withdrawal
shall be forwarded to this Court no later than March 29, 2013. Within thirty days of appointment,
substitute counsel shall file an amended brief, making such amendments as new counsel deems
appropriate.
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose
Abated
Filed: March 14, 2013
Do Not Publish
2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 729, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 25, 2013, no pet. h.) (not designated for publication).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richard Dean Kercheff v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-dean-kercheff-v-state-texapp-2013.