Richard D. Williams v. United States

406 F.2d 704
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 7, 1969·No. 22323_1·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant contends that he is not subject to the Universal Military Training and Service Act: (1) because he is a member of the Western Shoshone Nation of Indians and therefore neither a “citizen” nor an “alien” admitted for permanent residence within the meaning of 50 U.S.C. App. § 454(a); and (2) because he is, in any event, exempt from service with the armed forces of the United States by virtue of The Treaty of Peace and Friendship of 1863 between the United States and the Western Shoshone. We reject both contentions on the authority of Ex Parte Green, 123 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1941). See also Albany v. United States, 152 F.2d 266 (6th Cir. 1945).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard D. Williams v. United States, 406 F.2d 704 (9th Cir. 1969).

406 F.2d 704 (Richard D. Williams v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Granite Valley Hotel Ltd. Partnership v. Jackpot Junction Bingo & Casino
559 N.W.2d 135 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1997)
Cohen v. Little Six, Inc.
543 N.W.2d 376 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1996)
United States v. Robert Gene Rosebear
500 F.2d 1102 (Eighth Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Cook
383 F. Supp. 353 (N.D. New York, 1974)
United States v. Craig
353 F. Supp. 121 (D. Minnesota, 1973)
United States v. Neptune
337 F. Supp. 1028 (D. Connecticut, 1972)