Home/D.C. Circuit/Richard D. Peterson v. United States

Richard D. Peterson v. United States

315 F.2d 48, 114 U.S. App. D.C. 302, 52 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2261, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6155
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 14, 1963
Docket17305_1
StatusPublished

This text of 315 F.2d 48 (Richard D. Peterson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richard D. Peterson v. United States, 315 F.2d 48, 114 U.S. App. D.C. 302, 52 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2261, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6155 (D.C. Cir. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is from the denial of a motion to vacate the sentence and judgment entered on a plea of guilty to violation of the Harrison Narcotic Act, 26 U.S.C. § 4704(a). Judge Schweinhaut accepted the plea after following a very careful procedure to be assured that the plea was entered intelligently, freely, and with comprehension of its nature and consequences.. On careful consideration of appellant’s appeal we find no reason to vacate the sentence and judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 4704
26 U.S.C. § 4704(a)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
315 F.2d 48, 114 U.S. App. D.C. 302, 52 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2261, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-d-peterson-v-united-states-cadc-1963.