Richard Christinsen v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Richard Christinsen v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 29, 2018

Docket17-3158

StatusPublished

This text of Richard Christinsen v. State of Florida (Richard Christinsen v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richard Christinsen v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-3158 _____________________________

RICHARD CHRISTINSEN,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction.

March 29, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition is denied on the merits.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Richard Christinsen, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI