Richard Charles Meier v. United States

384 F.2d 743, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4865
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 16, 1967
Docket21013_1
StatusPublished

This text of 384 F.2d 743 (Richard Charles Meier v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richard Charles Meier v. United States, 384 F.2d 743, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4865 (9th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have examined the record and are satisfied that the evidence of appellant’s guilt was more than sufficient, that there was no error in the admission of evidence, that appellant had effective assistance of counsel, and that appellant’s motion for new trial was properly denied.

The rule announced in United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967), and Gilbert v. State of California, 388 U.S. 263, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967), is not available to appellant since the lineup complained of did not occur after June 12, 1967. See Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 296, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967). Nothing in the record suggests a denial of due process. 388 U.S. at 301-302, 87 S.Ct. 1967.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Wade
388 U.S. 218 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Gilbert v. California
388 U.S. 263 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Stovall v. Denno
388 U.S. 293 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
384 F.2d 743, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-charles-meier-v-united-states-ca9-1967.