RICHARD CARL GOUDREAU v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of 263 So. 3d 822 (RICHARD CARL GOUDREAU v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
RICHARD CARL GOUDREAU, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4024 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )
Opinion filed January 23, 2019.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; Donald H. Mason, Judge.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lisa Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, Judge.
Richard Carl Goudreau challenges the five-year prison sentence imposed
upon the revocation of his probation and adjudication of guilt of aggravated assault with
a deadly weapon. At the violation-of-probation hearing, the trial court, upon finding that
Goudreau had willfully and substantially violated probation, immediately revoked his probation and imposed sentence. Defense counsel then conferred with Goudreau and
stated that Goudreau wanted to address the court regarding sentencing, but the court
responded: "I've already made my decision on the sentencing. There's really nothing I
wish to hear from this point forward."
On appeal, Goudreau argues, and the State concedes, that the trial court
erred in sentencing him without affording him—and, in fact, affirmatively denying him—
his right of allocution. We agree. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.720(b); State v. Scott, 439 So.
2d 219, 221 (Fla. 1983); Hodierne v. State, 141 So. 3d 1254, 1255 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014);
Hill v. State, 246 So. 3d 392, 396-97 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). Accordingly, we affirm the
revocation of Goudreau's probation and the judgment adjudicating guilt, but we reverse
the resulting sentence and remand for a new sentencing hearing.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded.
CASANUEVA and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 So. 3d 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-carl-goudreau-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.