Richard C. Weidman v. Richard J. Jamborsky, Honorable Chief Judge, Circuit Court of Fairfax County

37 F.3d 1497, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34957, 1994 WL 580059

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 24, 1994
• Docket: 94-1973
• Status: Published

Opinion

37 F.3d 1497
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Richard C. WEIDMAN, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Richard J. JAMBORSKY, Honorable Chief Judge, Circuit Court
of Fairfax County, Defendant Appellee.

No. 94-1973.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 26, 1994.
Decided Oct. 24, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-557)

Richard C. Weidman, appellant Pro Se.

William Mark Dunn, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Weidman v. Jamborsky, No. CA-94-557 (E.D. Va. June 27, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.