Richard C. Respondek v. Sandpiper Apartments

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 7, 2019·No. 04-19-00123-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00123-CV

Richard C. RESPONDEK, Appellant

v.

SANDPIPER APARTMENTS, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CV01788 Honorable Gloria Saldana, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 7, 2019

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on April 17, 2019. By order dated July 3,

2019, appellant’s third motion for extension of time was granted, extending the deadline to file

appellant’s brief to July 22, 2019. Our order stated that if appellant failed to file his brief by July

22, 2019, this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9(a).

Because appellant has failed to file his brief, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See

id.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard C. Respondek v. Sandpiper Apartments, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Richard C. Respondek v. Sandpiper Apartments (Richard C. Respondek v. Sandpiper Apartments) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.