Richard C. Pollard v. Autotote, Ltd

872 F.2d 1131
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richard C. Pollard v. Autotote, Ltd. Read the opinion of the Court — 852 F.2d 67
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 26, 1989·No. 87-1691·Published

Opinion

872 F.2d 1131

Richard C. POLLARD, Appellant,
v.
AUTOTOTE, LTD.

No. 87-1691.

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Argued April 14, 1988.
Decided July 18, 1988.
As Amended April 26, 1989.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 86-6555); James T. Giles, Judge.

Before HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opinion filed July 18, 1988, 852 F.2d 67, be amended as follows:

Page 70, footnote 2, line 8 which reads: "... expressly exempt from ERISA's coverage. See 29 U.S.C. Sec. 1051(2)."

shall read: "... expressly exempt from ERISA's vesting requirements. See 29 U.S.C. Sec. 1051(2)."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard C. Pollard v. Autotote, Ltd, 872 F.2d 1131 (3d Cir. 1989).

872 F.2d 1131 (Richard C. Pollard v. Autotote, Ltd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richard C. Pollard v. Autotote, Ltd
852 F.2d 67 (Third Circuit, 1989)
Pollard v. Autotote, Ltd.
872 F.2d 1131 (Third Circuit, 1989)